Following Rafael Nadal‘s 11th French Open win, it’s worth looking at just how amazing his best-of-five set record on clay is. He now has a 111-2 win-loss record, with his only two losses against Söderling and Djokovic.
Win-loss breakdown by tournament (Masters tournament finals changed to best of 3 sets from 2007):
- French Open: 86-2
- Davis Cup: 18-0
- Barcelona Open: 2-0
- Monte Carlo Masters: 2-0
- Rome Masters: 2-0
- Stuttgart: 1-0
Win-loss breakdown by number of sets (overall he has won 331 and lost 36 completed sets so even winning a set against him is a big deal!):
- 5 sets: 4-0 (Coria, Federer, Isner, Djokovic – 5th set scores 7-6 (6), 7-6 (5), 6-4, 9-7 respectively)
- 4 sets: 22-1 (loss to Söderling)
- 3 sets: 83-1
Most common opponents (2 or more matches):
- Djokovic: 7-1 (lost 7 sets)
- Federer: 7-0 (lost 7 sets)
- Ferrer: 4-0 (lost 1 set)
- Almagro: 4-0
- Hewitt: 4-0 (lost 1 set)
- Söderling: 3-1 (lost 3 sets)
- Thiem: 3-0
- del Potro: 3-0 (lost 1 set)
- Gasquet: 3-0
- Seppi: 2-0 (lost 1 set)
- Murray: 2-0
- Roddick: 2-0 (lost 1 set)
- Coria: 2-0 (lost 3 sets)
- Ljubicic: 2-0
- Monaco: 2-0
- Bolelli: 2-0
- Wawrinka: 2-0 (same score of 6-2 6-3 6-1 both times)
- Bellucci: 2-0
Breakdown by set score (almost the same likelihood of winning a set 6-2, 6-3 or 6-4):
- 6-0: 26
- 6-1: 61
- 6-2: 68
- 6-3: 66
- 6-4: 67
- 7-5: 18
- 7-6: 24
- 9-7: 1
- 6-7: 9
- 5-7: 6
- 4-6: 8
- 3-6: 6
- 2-6: 3 (Federer in 2006 Rome, Söderling in 2009 French Open, Djokovic in 2012 French Open)
- 1-6: 3 (Federer in 2006 French Open, del Potro in 2011 Davis Cup, Djokovic in 2015 French Open)
- 0-6: 1 (Coria in 2005 Monte Carlo Masters)
(only one incomplete set 2-0 after which Pablo Carreno Busta retired)
References
(1) Tennis Abstract: Rafael Nadal ATP Match Results, Splits, and Analysis
Thanks for this. Can you repeat for (e.g.) “Federer in best of 5 set matches on grass” & “Djokovic in best of 5 set matches on hardcourt”? (Neither will be close to this impressive but will still be interesting.)
Comment by someone — March 8, 2019 @ 6:18 pm |